Filtering by Tag: Swiss Chalet

Food Safety Talk 23: Hello? Hello? Stalkers? Or closing the barn door after stepping on the cat

Added on by Ben Chapman.

Season 2 kicked off with the introduction of special guest stalker Chip Manuel who joined the guys from the Dan Benjamin style box in Ben’s office to provide a student perspective of IAFP.

The discussion started with an IAFP meeting round-up, including some discussion of the official app (iPhone or Android) and why Ben was hiding from his ‘stalkers.’ Chip and Ben both loved how the app gave them the schedule in the pocket, but noted a few minor annoyances. Don was pleasantly surprised how many people at the meeting had used the app.

At IAFP, Chip chaired the student Professional Development Group (PDG) and helped organize the student luncheon, at which Don presented. Don felt somewhat unloved, since none of the students came up to him during the conference to say “Hi” afterward (even after offering free drinks), but Chip questioned why Don hadn’t joined the students at Karaoke. Ben didn’t have the same problem as Don, so maybe students are intimidated because Don is the IAFP president. However, Ben felt that there were few non-students to mix with during the IAFP Student Mixer and maybe a speed networking between students and professionals will take place next year.

Ben didn’t go to any symposia or round-tables unless he was presenting in them, because he concentrated on the technical talks to find really new, fresh and interested things. Don noted that the “clicker” audience feedback was really useful and Ben enjoyed the clickers from a speaker’s perspective as it helped shape the talks on the fly.

The guys then explored their paranoia for double booking themselves for talks. This reminded Ben of a talk he gave on “Using multiple media and messages to create and foster a good food safety culture” in Tennessee. After the talk he was stumped by an audience question about a rumor that Ben had floated his Fanny down the Ganny, which was related to a festival in Port Hope.

The discussion then turned to follow up. Ben forgot his homework to watch “The Wire” as he’d been watching the Olympics. The conversation turned to the Olympics and sports more broadly and Ben recalled some watching a women’s soccer game  while working at a bar.

Related to the vomit incident discussed in the previous podcast, third biggest fan, Mike Roberson sent a message asking whether Ben offered some food safety suggestions with Swiss Chalet. Ben noted that he hadn’t, but that it would involve sectioning off the contaminated area and avoiding moving contaminated mops, buckets and staff back into the kitchen area. This led to Chip providing some information about his scientific background and his current work on Norovirus nested PCR assays with Lee-Ann Jaykus. Chip agreed with Ben’s approach for dealing with the vomit incident. In particular he mentioned the importance of separating the clean-up from food preparation and also the need to use validated decontaminants to inactivate Norovirus.

The guys the explored their scientific family trees. In particular, Chip’s scientific grandfather is Martin Videman, which makes Karl Batt his scientific great-grandfather and Myron Solberg is great-great grandfather.

Ben then raised an issue he became aware of as part of his involvement with North Caroline Fresh Produce Safety Taskforce. Listeria monocytogenes had been found on cantaloupes though MDP surveillance, though no illnesses had been reported. Product was tracked back to Burch farm and cantaloupes were recalled over a number of days. Ben posed some questions about what such a recall says about production practices, especially in comparison to the Jensen’s farm outbreak last year. He also wondered whether cantaloupes were in a different risk category compared to other fresh produce. Don thought that Listeria would be found on other fresh produce and that cantaloupes clearly are a risk (as seen from last year’s outbreak – though there were apparently a number of processing issues). But at the same time he cautioned that to understand the risk better one would need to know the levels and how growth of Listeria might occur. Chip hadn’t found much Listeria in soil as part of his Master’s Thesis, despite Listeria having been reported as “ubiquitous” in soil. However, this discrepancy may be related to specificity issues with the diagnostic methods previously used, such as the simplified Henry technique. Ben felt that cantaloupes, and watermelon, do belong into their own risk category as they are grown on the ground, but unlike other produce they are eaten raw and can support the growth once they are cut. In addition, after cutting they are often stored for a number of days at temperatures that will promote the growth of Listeria.

The FDA had described Burch farm as having unsanitary conditions, but Don questioned whether other farms would actually be similar and whether this is in fact a risk factor for a fresh produce farm. Don then wondered whether it’s “blaming consumers” when the increase in risk comes from the practices in the home, i.e. storage, temperature and handling. And what is the solution to this? Is it the farmer’s or retailers responsibility to produce a Listeria-free cantaloupe or would an education campaign on proper storage and usage be more effective? And what would that proper storage be? Don also floated his pipe dream of retailers being able to avoid recalling food products because they are doing an excellent job at educating their consumers (of the risks). Chip found it interesting that all five Listeria isolates stored as part of the MDP program, were linked to human isolates on PulseNet and he wondered what would happen for this recall.

Don then gave kudos to Evan Henke for some cryptic tweets that managed to confuse Mike Batz. He also recalled how impressed he was when he shopped at Shaw’s supermarket, because they provided wipes for sanitizing hands and shopping cart handles. He was even more impressed by the public food safety announcement in the store that color was not an indication of doneness.  Ben then recalled some work by Sandy McCurdy on emotion-based messaging in retail stores for thermometer usage.

The guys then discussed three pieces of Don’s follow up. First was an article on eco-contamination in hotel rooms from which Ben learned not to lick the light switch or TV remote, though noodling for catfish seems to be OK. The guys then discussed an article by Dr David Acheson on the intersection of food safety and politics, which reminded Ben of Creekstone’s request for 100% BSE testing. But Don warned of the danger that regulators need to watch out for, namely that increased food safety standards aren’t used as non-tariff trade barriers. The final piece of follow up related to the discussion in the last podcasts on visual inspection of chicken carcasses. The guys are still wondering how an inspector can see anything on a chicken carcass that they have a third of a second to thoroughly examine and Don got grumpy at the chicken processor who didn’t want to be responsible for the food safety of the chicken he produces.

The guys finished off with a quick chat about their crazy upcoming travel schedules. Ben mentioned his involvement in the development of a ‘video game’ for farmers markets, which reminded Don of testing the beta version of Ninja Kitchen.

Food Safety Talk 23: Hello? Hello? Stalkers? Or closing the barn door after stepping on the cat

Food Safety Talk 22 – Gut demons, miniature blood Nazis, vampire nanobots and scientific reviewers

Added on by Don Schaffner.

The guys started with the usual technical problems but this time they were self-inflicted rather than Skype induced.

Don started off by talking about FSIS Risk Assessment for Guiding Public Health-Based Poultry Slaughter Inspection, which he is currently reviewing. The risk assessment is part of FSIS’ attempt to modernize their meat inspection system. Despite the introduction of HACCP in the mid 90’s, the current system relies on inspecting every carcass for visually observable contamination, obviously missing microbiological contamination, like in Gary Larson’s “Early microbiologists.” The risk assessment was undertaken to assess whether allowing FSIS personnel to undertake off-line inspection verification activities would result in reductions (or at least no increase) in the occurrence of Salmonella or Campylobacter on finished poultry carcasses.

The risk assessment is largely based on a data rich and complicated regression model, which attempts to model the prevalence of Salmonella or Campylobacter from different types of inspections activities. While ultimately nothing is clear-cut, the risk assessment does indicate that moving inspectors from on-line inspection to more risk-based off-line activities will not result in more foodborne illness. However, the coding system used in the risk assessment was turning Don into 'grumpy pants' and reminded Ben of Bingo, and it shows an apparent communication disconnect between those undertaking the modeling and those writing up the risk assessment.

The conversation then turned to FSMA and the delay in the regulations. Ben’s worried that some companies may be holding off on undertaking certain activities until the regulations come out. For example, he thinks that some business may be holding off on training staff until the training standards are better defined. Both agreed that concern for food safety and public health didn’t stop due to the lack of regulations and that any effort expended in planning and thinking about food safety is not wasted. Don is hopeful that even if the FSMA is repealed that the good ideas in FSMA will not be lost, and neither will the activities of the Food Safety Preventative Control Alliance be wasted.

Since the last podcast, Don had been to his favorite restaurant, Moosewood in Ithaca, NY while Ben started his visit to Canada with a trip to Tim Hortons to bask in the Canadian ambiance and slang, such as beauty and giver, eh? Ben also went to Swiss Chalet with his mom and dad. When a child on a nearby table  vomited, Ben’s neurotic father wanted to know whether they should move. But Ben assured him that they were OK, having ulterior motives in mind. One of the kitchen staff then came out of the kitchen to clean up the vomit with a bucket, mop and some cleaning cloths, before disappearing back into the kitchen, clearly not following CDC’s guidelines for cleaning up vomit. Ben was of course aware of the risks associated with airborne Norovirus infection as shown by his Food Safety Info Sheet and his careful reading this article. But he wanted to see how the restaurant handled the cleanup, even at the risk of his own heath and that of his parents!

On the social media front, Don recommended that Ben follow Michele Catalano and John Roderick (from Roderick on the Line) on Twitter. Don was totally in awe of Mike Batz’s Twitter-awesomeness when Mike replied to John’s tweet about the bactericidal effects of coffee with “Coffee kills gut demons, miniature blood Nazis, and vampire nanobots. But not milk devils. Everybody knows this.” Ben is again trying to engage more on Twitter, but he wasn’t impressed with McDonald’s Executive Chef’s video on how to do a Big Mac at home.

The guys then discussed scientific writing. Despite Don’s best efforts he can’t get his students to write better, though maybe collaboration with Michelle Danyluk on “How to write a paper that won’t piss off your advisor” might help. He’d even be happy if students learned to use a reference manager like Sente. Ben is trying out some advice he’d received from Gord Surgeoner during his graduate studies – with a bit of luck it’ll earn him some beers.

While Don is generally happy with his own scientific writing he wasn’t happy with the reviewer of his recent JFP manuscript entitled “Issues to consider when setting intervention targets with limited data for low-moisture food commodities: A peanut case study” which arose out of an ILSI North America sponsored meeting. The reviewer thought that the approach was very simplified and not novel enough. He clearly didn’t understand the complexities of making decisions from limited data – something the smartest people in this field in the country struggled with.

Finally, the guys got excited about the upcoming IAFP meeting, for which Don had done an IAFP webinar for students and IAFP meeting first timers, which was all about how to meet people. Don also offered to a buy a beverage of choice for any listener who mentions to podcast to Don at the IAFP meeting. 

Food Safety Talk 22: Gut demons, miniature blood Nazis, vampire nanobots and scientific reviewers